Posted on

Hamas’ attacks: the US sabotaging the Netanyahu + Salman approach — Engin Kurtay


An advance in tourism business by establishing nude beach at the coast from Israeli border till the Egyptian border is administered to improve the economic conditions in Gaza Strip

The Palestine Liberation Organizasyon used to have a secular, progressive political agenda. The US project to clash it with its radical Islamist version was in line with the green belt doctrine in force during the 80s. Then throughout 90s and 2000s the left had been made to adopt this religious radicalism with the pretext of democracy and the green belt doctrine which used to be considered as a corner stone of the Middle Eastern fascism in the 70s and the 80s was made forgotten. Victimization and patheticising played the crucial role here — as it is a general case for all kinds of fascistic movements Continue reading “Hamas’ attacks: the US sabotaging the Netanyahu + Salman approach — Engin Kurtay”

Posted on

Kazın ayağı taraklıdır

Istanbul Institute of
Russian and Sovietic Studies

Üstte: Açlıktan ölen ayıya ağlayan Kanadalı Paul Nicklen
Altta: Kanada’da fok katliamı

Bilgi sermaye son derece kaygan, değeri sıfırlanabilen, yenilenen, kopyalanan bir üretim aracı olduğu için, rantiye hale geldiğinde bu pozisyonunu ancak devlet koruması altında sürdürebilir. Bu nedenle bilgi sermaye oligarşisi, bu korumayı sağlamak yerine, bilgi rantını sınırlayan ya da engelleyen merkeziyetçi-devletçi rejimlerle de amansız bir çelişki halindedir. Bu temel çelişkiyi ilerici ve gerçekçi sol politikalara tedavül etmek için solcunun önce ırkçı, etnik, kültürel, yerelci, kimlikçi siyaseti bir yana bırakmasi, elde hazır kurumsal ve hukuki araçlarını, sistemin karşılayamadığı vaadleri son noktasına kadar götürecek şekilde kullanması gerekir. Aksi takdirde tahteravallinin yanlış tarafına basmaya devam edeceğinden, bu çelişkiyi sol değil -daha önce de olduğu gibi- devletçi keynesçi ekonomi politikaları çözecektir. Continue reading “Kazın ayağı taraklıdır”

Posted on

The new ideological warfare between etatism and globalism

Istanbul Institute of
Russian and Sovietic Studies

At Left: The “English” Ivan the Terrible, the CEO of Muscovy Company, a “globalist”
At Right: Peter the Third, who was betrayed and dethroned by his wife, an “etatist”

What is the real stake behind the over-romanticising of October Revolution by The New York Times? It is also noticeable that Putin’s regime overlooks Lenin and the October Revolution. Is a new propanganda warfare on re-writing history between American establishment and Russian regime coming out? Could we link this warfare to Trump’s election and his neo-keynesian economy-politics aiming to overcome the current (2008) “great depression”? And the rise of Russia as the new global power undertaking huge infrastructures namely the New Silk Road, Yamal Project, Shanghai Five, rebuilding the Eurasia-centered World system as the new global converging market? Continue reading “The new ideological warfare between etatism and globalism”