Posted on

They are “victims”, therefore they are tolerable to be Nazis! — Engin Kurtay


LGBTQ+ is the biopolitics of neo-Nazism

Around mid-October 2022 news reported that two idiots committed suicide in Yerevan — but be careful, no news defined them as “idiots”. It’s us, who define them as “idiots”. No one else!

But what it is exactly the “idiocy” here?

It’s certainly NOT in the fact that the suiciders were gays, as many other idiots (some even among our readers) would hastily love grabbing the assertion that we were homophobic and that’s why we call them “idiots”. Fortunately not all gays are LGBTQ+ indoctrinated and the smartest ones are even against to it — against being politically manipulated by dirty LGBTQ+ agendas. Continue reading “They are “victims”, therefore they are tolerable to be Nazis! — Engin Kurtay”

Posted on

The rise of NATO bloody ass* politics in Sweden by the assassination of Olof Palme through the persecution of Julian Assange — Engin Kurtay

(*) The bloody ass politics is a recently developed technical term in Political Science by Istanbul Institute of Russian and Sovietic Studies (IIRSS). It designates the scholastic fabrication of victimization discourses by the feminist and LGBTQ+ intelligentsia. The term is used in accordance with the postulate that victimization discourses are the typical sine-qua-non fundamentals for fascist self-justifications.

The pic above shows the protest of a feminist activist in Cannes Film Festival in 2022 Spring. The rationale of her protest is to ass-ociate the female victimization (the concept of ‘rape’) with the situation of Ukraine against Russia. Our upcoming studies will focus on how the victimization logic is constitutive for formenting interpassivity against the neo-nazism. Continue reading “The rise of NATO bloody ass* politics in Sweden by the assassination of Olof Palme through the persecution of Julian Assange — Engin Kurtay”

Posted on

The joy of shifting between middle finger and bloody ass — Engin Kurtay

An illustration from a Medieval manuscript
Source:
Open Culture, December 8th, 2020

We previously studied the complications of “playing with Other’s toy” by showing the similarities between the Ukrainian kids’ playing with the plush Javelin toys and the UkroNazis’ playing with the real Javelin missile toys.

Now we will study a similar case:

The unbearable lightness of defending the independence of Ukraine by the Ukrainians who well fulfilled their fantasies by having already moved to the West…

The similarity between the two cases is that, while in both cases they allegedly struggle for their independence, they pathetically end up in—dependence by mind and soul. Continue reading “The joy of shifting between middle finger and bloody ass — Engin Kurtay”

Posted on

Sexual is (not) Political – Part 4 – Prof Slavoj Žižek

The opposition between the sexual politics (“biopolitics” in Foucaultian terms) of religious fundamentalism (whose extreme cases are ISIS and Boko Haram) and the radicalism of LGBT+ forms an axis of excesses from which one should distinguish another axis [axis-y], the one of the opposition between the two “normal” (and much more predominant) stances, the “normal” conservative family ideology which is ready to deplore the extremist excesses [the red curve], and the “normal” stance of liberal permissiveness which supports feminism and gay rights but prefers to mockingly dismiss the excesses of LGBT+ [the blue curve].

The basic axis is this one [y]. And each of its two opposed poles [the closer peaks to y-axis of both red and blue curves] tends to dismiss its radicalized version (Muslim-style extreme subordination of women is rejected by moderate-conservative Muslims; the excessive measures advocated by LGBT+ are also rejected by the mainstream advocates of women’s rights and of gay rights). Each side rejects such extremes as its own pathological outgrowth, as something belonging to those who have lost the proper human measure.

Continue reading “Sexual is (not) Political – Part 4 – Prof Slavoj Žižek”

Posted on

Cinselliğin Politikası (olmaz) – Bölüm 3 – Prof Slavoj Zizek

tmp_7887-gorsel-4863370659

LGBT trendi standard kabul edilmiş cinsel karşıtlığın “yapı çözümlemesini” (deconstruction) yapabilir. İç gerilim ve tutarsızlıkları içinde tarihsel varoluş koşullarını göstererek, cinsel ayrımı kendiliğinden verili bir varoluşsal özelliğimiz olmaktan da çıkarabilir (de-ontologize). Ne var ki bütün bu doktrin, sayısız cinsel tercihin zorla ikili cinsel karşıtlığa (kadın ve erkek) sıkıştırılmış olduğunu, eğer ki bu ikili karşıtlıktan, yapay ve sıkı sıkıya belli kılıflardan sıyrılabilirsek özgürleşeceğimiz varsayımına dayanır. Neymiş efendim, hele ki şu ikili karşıtlıktan kendimizi kurtaralım, işte o zaman kendimizi gey, çiftcinsiyetli, ya da her neysek, o şekilde kendimizi bulabilirmişiz… Lacancı formül ise kazın ayağının hiç de öyle olmadığı söyler: karşıtlık (antagonizm) ve buna bağlı iç gerilim zaten cinselliğin temel kurucu ögesidir ve bu nedenle başka hiç bir tercihin hakikatine indirgenemez. Ne kadar farklı sınıflandırmalar yaparsanız yapın, bu iç gerilimi boşaltamazsınız. Continue reading “Cinselliğin Politikası (olmaz) – Bölüm 3 – Prof Slavoj Zizek”

Posted on

Sexual is (not) Political – Part 3 – Prof Slavoj Zizek

tmp_7887-gorsel-4863370659

Although the LGBT trend is right in “deconstructing” the standard normative sexual opposition, in de-ontologizing it, however, it reduces this tension to the fact that the plurality of sexual positions is forcefully reduced to the normative straight-jacket of the binary opposition of masculine and feminine, with the idea that, if we get away with this straight-jacket, we will get a full blossoming multiplicity of sexual positions (LGBT etc.), each of them with a full ontological consistency: once we get rid of the binary straight-jacket, I can fully recognize myself as gay, bisexual, or whatever. From the Lacanian standpoint, however, the antagonistic tension is irreducible, it is constitutive of the sexual as such, and no amount of classificatory diversification and multiplication can save us from it. Continue reading “Sexual is (not) Political – Part 3 – Prof Slavoj Zizek”

Posted on

Sexual is (not) Political – Part 2 – Prof Slavoj Zizek

tmp_10679-gorsel-1463884116
Trudeau, profiting from the parade

The irony of this parade is that the situation from decades ago is almost symmetrically inverted: now it is heterosexuality which is tolerated, of course, but it is expected from heterosexual majority not to display their orientation with too much pride since such display would be instantly qualified as heterosexist – heterosexuality is (not explicitly but subtly) perceived as a limitation, as a sexual orientation which is opportunistically satisfied with the old established patterns and avoids the risk to explore new liberating possibilities, as an impassive submission to the libidinal order imposed by the structure of social domination.
Continue reading “Sexual is (not) Political – Part 2 – Prof Slavoj Zizek”

Posted on

Cinselliğin Politikası (olmaz) – Bölüm 2 – Prof Slavoj Zizek

tmp_10679-gorsel-1463884116
Kanada Başbakanı Trudeau, Onur Yürüyüşünden nemalanırken..

Karşıcinsçiliğe bu eleştirel bakış her ne kadar normatif olmama, farklı yönelimlere açık olma iddasında olsa da, bunu alttan alta karşıcinsel-olmayan [non-heterosexual] yönelimlere ayrıcalık yüklemeden yapamıyordu. Bu ayrıcalık yüklemesi de, karşıcinsel-olmayan [non-heterosexual] yönelimlerin – en azından – egemen ideolojinin etkisinden daha bağımsız olduklarına ve egemen ideolojiye karşı radikal bir karşı çıkışı temsil ettiklerine dair imalar içeriyordu.

Continue reading “Cinselliğin Politikası (olmaz) – Bölüm 2 – Prof Slavoj Zizek”