Source:
Open Culture, December 8th, 2020
We previously studied the complications of “playing with Other’s toy” by showing the similarities between the Ukrainian kids’ playing with the plush Javelin toys and the UkroNazis’ playing with the real Javelin missile toys.
Now we will study a similar case:
The unbearable lightness of defending the independence of Ukraine by the Ukrainians who well fulfilled their fantasies by having already moved to the West…
The similarity between the two cases is that, while in both cases they allegedly struggle for their independence, they pathetically end up in—dependence by mind and soul.
We will show you three consecutive events:
First: Ukrainian protesters show middle finger to a pro-Russian, during a parade:
Here it is the second event we want to evaluate with the previous one: the protest matter here shifts into the bloody ass concept:
The “bloody ass” parade of Ukrainian protesters,
in a European city
Their show obviously connotes ‘rape’. But why a geopolitical conflict, a military violence, is associated with sexual violence? Here how the LGBT and the third wave feminism doctrines provide a multipurpose framework for the fabrication of any kind of victimization logic:
(1) Masculinity is the source of all kinds of violence;
(2) State and its military apparatus are ‘male’;
(3) I am violated by some State apparatus (and it’s military power);
(4) Therefore I am a victim.
But the middle finger doesn’t hold any place in the above logical inference. What does the middle finger of the protester in the first event indicate exactly? They don’t have their Javelin-toys in hands. Why? Because they are allowed to play with Javelin-toys only in the playground (in Ukrainian territory) designated for them — definitely not in any Western European city. Moreover, Russia has already warned the Western rogue states for the unintended consequences of their sending Javelin-toys to Ukraine indicating the danger that these toys could be played anywhere else as well as in the Western playgrounds of terrorists.
So, does the middle finger of the protester indicate — not a missile for a real fight but — a missing Javelin-toy?
Actually, we know that the phallus is always a signifier for a missing object.
Here it is through this lack (of power, of inner consistency, doctrine for a real fight, full-hearted belief, a sound agency of big Other…) that we can figure out how the shift to bloody ass becomes a placatory concept in the case of the second protest.
This relief outcrops several catches: why specifically ‘bloody ass’ but not ‘bloody vagina’? Should a raper choose specifically the ass but not the vagina? Why do you envisage an ideal typical raper as an ass fucker? Is it because anal sex is often associated with gay sex? If so, why should there be more rapists among gays than people having other sexual orientations? Or do you associate people’s sufferings in war situation with the pain in anal sex? What’s more scandalous in your shorty minds when you organize these “protest” parades in the safest streets of the Western cities?
The above tiny questions lead us asking one bulky toxic question:
Why the letters ‘S’ (standing for “Sado-“) and ‘M’ (standing for “-Masoshism”) have never been annexed to LGBTQ…? Why LGBT politicians and namely the NATO Gladio-academics, Judith Butler, Barbara Risman and their colleagues are against such legitimate, mutually consented, sexual orientations between adults?
Awaiting their answers.
And hereunder how this sick mindedness proceeds… the third event:
Actors: the Ukrainian protesters
Having accomplished their short drama duty, now they are partying with the blood of the “victims” on their dresses.
Because they have never really cared their own country. They ran after a fantasy which eventually converted them into dandies.
Enjoy then!